{"id":582,"date":"2011-11-16T14:00:55","date_gmt":"2011-11-16T22:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/?p=582"},"modified":"2011-11-16T14:00:55","modified_gmt":"2011-11-16T22:00:55","slug":"research-is-not-regurgitation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/2011\/11\/16\/research-is-not-regurgitation\/","title":{"rendered":"research is not regurgitation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m sick of the supposed Henry Ford quote. \u00a0You know:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If I\u2019d asked customers what they wanted, they would have said \u2018a faster horse\u2019.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course, this quote is\u00a0<a title=\"T-Bird quote with an Edsel attribution\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.chicagotribune.com\/news_columnists_ezorn\/2011\/10\/t-bird-quote-with-an-edsel-attribution.html\">apocryphal<\/a><sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-582-1' id='fnref-582-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(582)'>1<\/a><\/sup>. \u00a0The best ones often are. \u00a0This apocryphal quote <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/galleries\/2008\/fortune\/0803\/gallery.jobsqna.fortune\/2.html\">made it all the way to Steve Jobs<\/a>, who often used it to explain why Apple rarely uses research.<\/p>\n<p>This quote and its repetition shows very little understanding of user research. \u00a0No researcher worth their notebook just goes out and says &#8220;so, what would you like us to give to you?&#8221; and then regurgitates that answer and feels proud of the research that they&#8217;ve just done. \u00a0I wouldn&#8217;t accept that research from the youngest user experience intern, let alone someone who calls themselves a researcher.<\/p>\n<p>When you conduct research, you don&#8217;t know what the outcome will be. \u00a0Sometimes, you don&#8217;t even know what you&#8217;re looking for. \u00a0You conduct the research looking for that key insight, the unmet and unstated need. \u00a0You should, at least occasionally, go out and conduct research with no goal in mind other than, &#8220;let&#8217;s learn something new&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>After you&#8217;ve conducted your research, you analyze it to death. \u00a0You don&#8217;t just look for the easy quotes where a research participant tells you what they think they want. \u00a0You look deeper. \u00a0You go over your data with a fine-toothed comb. \u00a0You pull apart the data and put it back together in new and exciting ways. \u00a0And then you learn something new, and you go back and try to figure out the right thing to do with this new information.<\/p>\n<p>Great research gives you insight that you didn&#8217;t have before and that you hadn&#8217;t yet imagined. \u00a0Great research can help form the basis of a whole new strategy. \u00a0Yes, there&#8217;s bad research out there that really does just regurgitate what someone said, but don&#8217;t let the existence of bad research stop you from conducting truly great research.<\/p>\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-582'>\n<div class='footnotedivider'><\/div>\n<ol>\n<li id='fn-582-1'> Not that this is going to stop people from quoting it. \u00a0Is there a word for quotes that aren&#8217;t actually quotes? \u00a0Other than &#8220;bullshit&#8221;, I suppose. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-582-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m sick of the supposed Henry Ford quote. \u00a0You know: If I\u2019d asked customers what they wanted, they would have said \u2018a faster horse\u2019. Of course, this quote is\u00a0apocryphal1. \u00a0The best ones often are. \u00a0This apocryphal quote made it all the way to Steve Jobs, who often used it to explain why Apple rarely uses &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/2011\/11\/16\/research-is-not-regurgitation\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">research is not regurgitation<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nadyne","category-ux"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=582"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":626,"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582\/revisions\/626"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nadynerichmond.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}